"Division of Ukrainian Society" and "Betrayal of the Elites" — Propaganda Myth

Essence of the Thesis and Its Purpose

Talks about the "division of Ukrainian society" and "betrayal of the elites" are a propaganda myth aimed at sowing doubt and distrust. The goal is to weaken internal unity and citizen mobilization, creating the illusion of instability.

Psychological Mechanisms

The myth operates through learned helplessness and "us vs. them" polarization. Constant repetition in the media, Telegram channels, and bots of the thesis on "elite betrayal" creates a sense of internal breakdown and alienation from state institutions.

Facts: Society is Consolidated

Representative studies refute the myth:

Ukrainian society remains one of the most consolidated in Europe under conditions of full-scale war.

Language and Regional Differences — Not a Division

Language and regional distinctions exist but do not lead to conflict. Russian-speaking citizens actively participate in defending the country, and national identity outweighs local differences.

Myth of "Elite Betrayal"

If the elites systematically betrayed the people, trust in the state would be destroyed. In practice:

Real Objectives of the Narrative

True Picture

Despite the war, Ukrainian society demonstrates resilience, self-organization, and solidarity. It is an active and cohesive community capable of overcoming challenges together.

Key Sources and References

About the Authors

This article was curated and verified by a team of experts in international law, human rights, and geopolitical analysis. Contributors have 15+ years of experience in research, legal documentation, and educational content development.

Methodology

The content on this site is compiled and verified by experts in international law, human rights, and geopolitical research. Sources include official legal documents, national and international legislation, resolutions of the UN, reports from international organizations, and verified open-source evidence. Each claim is cross-checked against multiple primary and secondary sources, ensuring accuracy, neutrality, and reliability regardless of the topic—whether analyzing violations of Russian law, Ukrainian law, or international legal norms.

Expert Statement

The authors affirm that the information presented reflects established legal interpretations and documented facts. Analyses are grounded in international law principles and widely recognized geopolitical assessments. References to official documents and reports are provided to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.

Last modified date: 25/11/2025